Citation: RESPUBLICA v. CARLISLE, 1 U.S. 35 (1778)
Background of the Case:
During the American Revolutionary War, Abraham Carlisle, a carpenter from Philadelphia, was accused of high treason against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Carlisle allegedly took commissions from British General Sir William Howe to guard the gates of Philadelphia, and joined forces with British troops.
Overview of the Case:
The case involved the prosecution of Abraham Carlisle for high treason. The prosecution aimed to prove that Carlisle’s actions and allegiance to the British constituted a betrayal of his duty to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Issue of the Case:
The central issue was whether Carlisle’s actions, including taking commissions from the British and joining their forces, amounted to high treason against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Facts of the Case:
Carlisle was accused of taking commissions from British General Sir William Howe to guard the gates of Philadelphia. He allegedly joined British forces and participated in hostile actions against the Commonwealth. The prosecution presented evidence of Carlisle’s commissions and his association with British troops.
Parties to the Case:
- Plaintiff: Respublica (the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania)
- Defendant: Abraham Carlisle
Judgment on the Case:
Carlisle was convicted of high treason by the jury. The court overruled the defendant’s reasons in arrest of judgment and upheld the conviction. Carlisle was subsequently executed.
About the Author
